Good Luck USA
Versus
Jack predicts USA 3 - 0 Iran
Todays the Day
England 3 - 1 France
Popular posts from this blog
Living with Parkinson's
Post by Prof Generaliter . You know, there is no other way of describing it, but being diagnosed with Parkinson’s, by an obviously delighted neurologist, makes for a bad day and I will admit to having felt more than a little pissed off. I was definitely grumpy for a few days and googling online for some information made things worse. The path in front of me looked unpleasant: pain, loss of mobility, possible dementia and my nurse's obsession - constipation and incontinence. Oh, joy, a future of wearing Tena’s for men and drinking litres of Movicol. It is reckoned that Parkinson’s has potentially up to 40 symptoms, not including the side effects caused by the medication. Some of which might seem amusing to all but the sufferers. Obsessive behaviour leading to a possible interest in porn, gambling or hypersexuality. People have been known to gamble away their pension and the partners of the sex obsessives have moved on from finding it ...
Gavin Ashendon - Chooses the Public Square Over Priesthood
Gavin Ashenden who was received into the Catholic Church in 2017 in 2019 has explained in Christian Today his reasons for withdrawing from ordination as a Catholic priest. Instead he believes he has a prophetic obligation to continue speaking out to defend orthodox Christianity. "When I became a Roman Catholic (which I did because I came to believe that what it taught about itself was true, and because Protestantism was slipping away from its capacity to read Scripture honestly), so many people turned to that old proverb “Be careful you don’t jump from the frying pan into the fire." However: "The Roman Catholic Church has suffered the same propagandisation of their people as the Protestants have. Secularism, relativism, and the progressive collectivist politics from the Left have swept through the education system and the media, producing great pressure to change Christianity into the image of a form of cultural Marxism. "It’s everywher...
In the news a day or two ago, I saw the ((Ῐ)) in the middle of the ayatollahs’ flag described as “a symbol of Allah”. Just out of curiosity, does anyone here know whether that is correct? And, if so, what is the backstory? What was its origin and how did it evolve?
ReplyDeleteFrom Wiki:
Delete"[T]his emblem is a highly stylised composite of various Islamic elements: a geometrically symmetric form of the word Allah ("God") and overlapping parts of the phrase lā ʾilāha ʾillā l-Lāh (There is no God Except Allah), forming a monogram in the form of a tulip it consists of four crescents and a line. The four crescents read from right to left; the first crescent is the letter aleph, the second crescent is the first laam; the vertical line is the second laam, and the third and fourth crescents together form the heh. Above the central stroke is a tashdid (a diacritical mark indicating gemination) resembling "W". The tulip shape of the emblem as a whole memorialises those who have died for Iran and symbolises the values of patriotism and self-sacrifice, building on a legend that red tulips grow from the shed blood of martyrs."
(cont)
Delete"Written in white and repeated eleven times on the inner edges of each the green and the red band is the phrase Allahu Akbar (God is the greatest) in a stylised version of the kufic script."
Yes, that's correct. It's a sword with four curves, which are highly stylised composites of various Islamic elements. The name 'Allah' is abstracted as the four curves and the shadda (the little crown) on top. Each of the five elements represents different religious principles. The tulip shape commemorates those who died for Iran, following an old Iranian belief that a red tulip will bloom on the grave of a martyred soldier.
DeleteIt was designed in 1980 to replace the Persian Lion and Sun emblem following the Iranian Revolution. Flags carrying the Persian motif have been widely used during the protests, with protesters claiming that it's the 'true flag' of Iran. The media seems to shy away from showing it, though...
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emblem_of_Iran
@Lain and @Happy Jack, thank you both. When I read that news story I was reminded of the Hungarian Revolution in 1956, when they tore out the Communist Party symbol and flew the flag with a big round hole in the middle. That’s something we haven’t seen in Iran (yet) …
DeleteRomanians did the same in 1989, cutting the communist insignia from their flag.
DeleteThe flag with the hole in the middle can still be seen here from time to time!
DeleteA tulip? The Iranians are Calvinists? Carl will be all conflicted.
DeleteOn the outlook for today's match, don't forget that Iran are a point up and have the option of playing for a draw — which is what most teams do, given the chance.
ReplyDeleteDidn't the Iranians complain the Americans had depicted their flag with the Allah symbol removed?
ReplyDeleteYes, that's the news story I was referring to.
DeleteOnly 5 minutes in, but are England really going to be boring all over again??
ReplyDeleteI wonder whether Southgate told them to take it easy, it's not a game they need to win.
DeleteMy mate says several teams are coasting at the moment, saving themselves for the next round.
DeleteYes it's not as if people have paid thousands of pounds to watch
Delete"Game management."
DeleteWell it was 1 nil USA
ReplyDeleteJack's days as a prophet are over!
ReplyDeleteSo the question is this - how did the US manage to not defeat Wales? And how did Wales manage to lose to Iran, for that matter? Inquiring minds want to know.
ReplyDeleteThe 'big' question is: How did England not defeat USA?
ReplyDeleteThat's football for you; full of mystery.
Good fortune on Sunday.
Well, one presumes the answer is that the US has achieved parity with England in Soccer. It was inevitable, of course .
DeleteSee you in the final then!
Delete