Pope Francis
What to make of Pope Francis eleven years into his pontificate?
We need to understand the pope and figure out
how to read and react to his words. We are a sound bite culture that is quick
to react and overreact.
The
key to “getting” Pope Francis is his first Apostolic
Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium.
Evangelii Gaudium prefigures much of what has been witnessed over these past eleven years in terms of the themes Pope Francis has chosen to prioritise. It is a pastoral document, written around the theme of Christian joy in order that the Church may rediscover the original source of evangelisation in the contemporary world.
"EvangeliiGaudium" is a long document – 50.000 words!
Pope Francis opens it with:
“The Joy of the Gospel fills the hearts and lives of all who
encounter Jesus. Those who accept his offer of salvation are set free from sin,
sorrow, inner emptiness and loneliness. With Christ joy is constantly born
anew. In this Exhortation I wish to encourage the Christian faithful to embark upon a new chapter of
evangelization marked by this joy, while pointing out
new paths for the Church’s journey in years to come.”(#1)
What is this new chapter and new path for the Church? The quote below sums
up the document well:
“I dream of a ‘missionary option’, that is, a
missionary impulse capable of transforming everything, so that the
Church’s customs, ways of doing things, times and schedules, language and
structures can be suitably channelled for the evangelization of
today’s world rather than for her self-preservation.”(#27)
As a Church, Pope Francis believes we have been in
self-preservation mode. We have hidden ourselves in bunkers to survive. Pope
Francis is calling for the Church to thrive by choosing the missionary option
in everything that we do.
The rest of the document is all about how we do this.
The main message around which all of Francis’ teaching revolves is found in the image of the Parable of the Prodigal Son. The Church is a tender Mother whose spouse, the loving Father of all, incessantly seeks out and waits for His children, bidding them to come home. Together, this spousal couple, God and his Church, longs to unite all human persons, making each of us their own son or daughter forever. (see #46 and #144)
For Pope
Francis, evangelisation begins by sharing the basic message of the Gospel:
“In catechesis too, we have
rediscovered the fundamental role of the first announcement or kerygma, which
needs to be the centre of all evangelizing activity and all efforts at Church
renewal… On the lips of the catechist the first proclamation must ring out over
and over: “Jesus Christ loves you; he gave his life to save you; and now he is
living at your side every day to enlighten, strengthen and free you.” (#164)
He notes the importance of the kerygma throughout
the life of a Christian:
“It is first in a qualitative
sense because it is the principal proclamation, the one which
we must hear again and again in different ways, the one which we must announce
one way or another throughout the process of catechesis, at every level and
moment.” (#164)
“I invite all Christians,
everywhere, at this very moment, to a renewed personal encounter with Jesus
Christ, or at least an openness to letting him encounter them; I ask all of you
to do this unfailingly each day. No one should think that this invitation is
not meant for him or her, since no one is excluded from the joy brought by the
Lord.” (#3)
Pope Francis then describes the sources of this
evangelisation.
First, we can evangelise only because of God
first loved us.
An evangelizing community
knows that the Lord has taken the initiative, he has loved us first (cf. 1
Jn 4:19), and therefore we can move forward, boldly take the initiative,
go out to others, seek those who have fallen away, stand at the crossroads and
welcome the outcast.
Second, our evangelisation depends on our
ability to accept the Gospel into our lives.
“Here we find the source and
inspiration of all our efforts at evangelization. For if we have received the
love which restores meaning to our lives, how can we fail to share that love
with others?” (#9)
The term “missionary disciple” is used
throughout the document. The two terms are used to hold in tension the need
both for a relationship with our Lord and the need to go to the outskirts to
preach the Gospel. One thing is very clear. Every baptised member of the
Catholic faith is called to evangelise and is called to be a missionary
disciple.
“In virtue of their baptism, all the members of the People of God have become missionary disciples (cf. Mt 28:19). All the baptized, whatever their position in the Church or their level of instruction in the faith, are agents of evangelization.” (#120)
“What I would like to propose is something
much more in the line of an evangelical discernment. It is the approach of a
missionary disciple, an approach ‘nourished by the light and strength of the
Holy Spirit.’” (#51)
“The Church is herself a
missionary disciple.” (#40)
Pope Francis spends a considerable amount of time on the parish
as he looks to see how a missionary impulse would change parish life:
“In all its activities the parish
encourages and trains its members to be evangelizers. It is a community of
communities, a sanctuary where the thirsty come to drink in the midst of their
journey, and a centre of constant missionary outreach. We must
admit, though, that the call to review and renew our parishes has not yet
sufficed to bring them nearer to people, to make them environments of living
communion and participation, and to make them completely mission-oriented.” (#28)
In some people we see an ostentatious preoccupation for the
liturgy, for doctrine and for the Church’s prestige, but without any
concern that the Gospel have a real impact on God’s faithful people
and the concrete needs of the present time.” (#95)
Then in regards to sharing the message of the Gospel:
“Pastoral ministry in a missionary style is not obsessed with
the disjointed transmission of a multitude of doctrines to be insistently
imposed…the message has to concentrate on the essentials, on what is most
beautiful, most grand, most appealing and at the same time most necessary. The
message is simplified, while losing none of its depth and truth, and thus
becomes all the more forceful and convincing.”
It is clear in the document that Francis sees the
centralisation of the Church as harming evangelisation.
“Countless issues involving evangelization today might be
discussed here, but I have chosen not to explore these many questions which
call for further reflection and study. Nor do I believe that the papal
magisterium should be expected to offer a definitive or complete word on every
question which affects the Church and the world. It is not advisable for the
Pope to take the place of local Bishops in the discernment of every issue which
arises in their territory. In this sense, I am conscious of the need to promote
a sound ‘decentralization.’” (#16)
One of the pope’s clearest aims in the document is for the
Church to be “permanently in a state of mission” and for her
to be liberated from “self-absorption” through a renewed
encounter with God’s love. He warns against “being comfortable” in
the faith and instead to “become excited by the mission of
communicating life to others.”
He states that if the Church’s moral teaching and virtues do
not “radiate forcefully and attractively,” then the “edifice
of the Church’s moral teaching risks becoming a house of cards.” It
would mean the Church’s doctrinal or moral points are “based on
specific ideological options,” which “run the risk of losing
its freshness and will cease to have ‘the fragrance of the Gospel.’”
The Pope’s insistence on inclusivity is frequently stated in the
document, from his exhortation that “the joy of the Gospel is for all
people: No one can be excluded” to his call for the Church’s doors to
be “always wide open” and that the “doors of the
sacraments” should not be closed “for simply any reason.” The
Eucharist, he adds, “although it is the fullness of sacramental life,
is not a prize for the perfect but a powerful medicine and nourishment for the
weak”
In #32 Francis lays out his vision for a potentially controversial goal: a decentralised Church. The papacy and the “central structures of the universal
Church” also need to hear “the call to pastoral conversion,” he
writes. He stresses that the Second Vatican Council called for a “concrete
realization of the collegial spirit” but regrets that this
desire “has not been fully realized, since a juridical status of
episcopal conferences which would see them as subjects of specific
attributions, including genuine
doctrinal authority, has not yet been sufficiently elaborated”.
He adds that “excessive centralization, rather than proving helpful,
complicates the Church’s life and her missionary outreach.”
Later Pope Francis again communicates his attitude toward
doctrine, saying “pastoral ministry in a missionary style is not
obsessed with the disjointed transmission of a multitude of doctrines to be
insistently imposed.” He later adds that an “imbalance” results
when “we speak more about law than about grace, more about the Church
than about Christ, more about the Pope than about God’s word.”
In a passage with relevance to subsequent
controversies, the Pope writes that “differing currents of thought
in philosophy, theology and pastoral practice, if open to being reconciled by
the Spirit in respect and love, can enable the Church to grow, since all of
them help to express more clearly the immense riches of God’s word.”
He goes on to say that for “those who long for a
monolithic body of doctrine guarded by all and leaving no room for nuance, this
might appear as undesirable and leading to confusion. But in fact such variety
serves to bring out and develop different facets of the inexhaustible riches of
the Gospel.”
His willingness to question long-held customs can be found in
#43, where he says that some “may be beautiful, but they no longer
serve as means of communicating the Gospel. We should not be afraid to
re-examine them.”
The Pope’s frequent criticisms during the course of his papacy
of the tendency of some within the Church toward “rigidity” can be traced back to #45, where he writes that a missionary heart “never opts
for rigidity and defensiveness” and that the Church has to “go
forth to everyone without exception.”
He warns against “fear of going astray” and “remaining
shut up within structures which give us a false sense of security, within rules
which make us harsh judges, within habits which make us feel safe, while at our
door people are starving and Jesus does not tire of saying to us: ‘Give them
something to eat.’”
He chastises those who “ultimately trust only in their
own powers and feel superior to others because they observe certain rules or
remain intransigently faithful to a particular Catholic style from the past.”
Francis adds that they have a “supposed soundness of
doctrine or discipline,” which leads to a “narcissistic and
authoritarian elitism, whereby, instead of evangelizing, one analyzes and
classifies others, and instead of opening the door to grace, one exhausts his
or her energies in inspecting and verifying.”
The Pope links spiritual worldliness to those with an “ostentatious
preoccupation for the liturgy, for doctrine and for the Church’s prestige, but
without concern that the Gospel have a real impact on God’s faithful people.”
Such worldliness, he says, can lead to “enmity,
division, calumny, defamation, vendetta, jealousy and the desire to impose
certain ideas at all costs, even to persecutions which appear as veritable
witch hunts. Whom are we going to evangelize if this is the way we act?”
He exhorts the faithful “not to think the Gospel message
must always be communicated by fixed formulations learned by heart or by
specific words which express an absolutely invariable content,” but,
rather, advocates a theology “in dialogue with other sciences and human
experiences,” saying it is “most important for our discernment
on how best to bring the Gospel message to different cultural contexts and
groups.”
Finally, Pope Francis urges accompaniment of those whose “situation before God and their life in grace are mysteries which no one can fully know from without.” He adds that the Gospel “tells us to correct others … without making judgments about their responsibility and culpability.”
Bearing in mind all the above, the controversies building during Pope Francis' pontificate all become more understandable.
It’s only a pretty small minority of Catholics, these days, who still crave that early morning shot of outrage, either for or against Pope Francis’s latest attempt to get his name in the papers. By now, surely, we have reached the point at which passing judgment on the Francis pontificate is a job that can safely be left to the historians.
ReplyDeleteVery true - but I suspect his soon to be published auto-biography is going to generate much commentary from all sides!
Delete
DeleteHis book was published yesterday. Amazon .com is plugging it as "#1 Best Seller in Religious Leader Biographies". That's not really saying very much, is it?
https://www.amazon.com/Life-Through-Franciss-Inspiring-Biography/dp/0063387522
No, it isn't!
DeleteVarious section of it are already the subject of debate on various sites.
Are you planning to read it, Jack? For my part, I’ll look at a page or two if I can find it free online, but if the Holy Father is expecting me to splash out any of my hard-earned on his brand new masterpiece, he’s in for a disappointment.
DeleteNope - not until I can get hold of a free copy!
DeleteI dunno. Honestly, I have no idea what he's talking about most of the time. It means nothing to me. Francis's entire theology, such as it is, is like a plate full of pepper sauce with no steak underneath it. In fairness, this is not an exclusively Francis thing. I've been swallowing the sauce for the past fifty years, with precious little steak to chew on, so when he comes out with another exhortation to "evangelise," I'm asking, "with what?" The sauce ain't going to do it. We're the oldest institution on the planet. We literally know everything there is to know about morality because we've been thinking about it for the last 2000 years, yet all we're getting is soundbites and, quite honestly, defamation of the characters of more traditionally minded people. That old Vietnam era song keeps running through my head -- "And it's one, two, three, what are we fighting for? Don't ask me I don't give a damn..."
ReplyDeleteActually, there's quite a bit of meat in the Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium and I would recommend reading it over several days given its length. It certainly gave me pause for thought and helped me understand Pope Francis. .
Delete[Quote:} "And it's one, two, three, what are we fighting for? Don't ask me I don't give a damn..."
DeleteI recognize that song because my grandson sings it from time to time. It was performed at Woodstock, he tells me, by Country Joe and the Fish.
I don't entirely agree, which is shocking, I know.
ReplyDeleteI don't think that the Church has been in bunker mode, it's been in outlook mode since the New Evangelisation started (in the 70s?). Some of EG reminds me of the CofE document Mission Shaped Church, which said much the same in the early 2000s, was elevated to almost canonical status and led to 'mission shaped' being tacked on to everything, before achieving nothing and being quietly forgotten.
To my mind (and this isn't exclusive to the RCC) it's been the fixation on 'outreach' that has caused a lot of these issues as the hierarchy has scrabbled to present Church doctrines in ways that are 'relevant' and 'accessible' to the world, downplaying the difficult bits and amping up the things they think people want to hear. But, at the same time, the foundation has been allowed to crumble - adults are barely catechised, confession and fasting becomes virtually optional in many parishes, traditional devotions are suppressed, religious orders and priests dwindle, discipline isn't kept and infighting flourishes. Calling churchgoers 'missionary disciples' when so many Catholics don't know the basics of their own faith isn't going to do much. If one is leaning out to save another, than one had better hope that the foundation on which one is standing is solid. At the moment, it isn't.
The other issue is that it seems increasingly clear to me that the hierarchy doesn't understand the world it's trying to evangelise. The abuse scandals really have cut the legs off any evangelistic endeavours for at least a generation. What is the 'joy of the Gospel' for people living in a post-Christian society? The reply to 'God loves you' in our current doom-laden world is surely 'well, it doesn't feel like it!' And if all we have is 'it gets better when you die', then we don't deserve to be taken seriously.
I would argue that the Church needs to go into a 'bunker', if by that we understand rebuilding the foundations of study, prayer and service upon which she was built. St. Paul says that he passed on that which he first received, and it's clear that a lot of people haven't yet received anything to pass on. The laity need to be formed by faithful and honest priests who themselves have been well formed (and aren't too busy running multiple parishes) and haven't been selected by bishops for whom the Church is a career ladder and who want to be surrounded by yes men. And the beating heart of monastic living (proper ones, not monks and nuns in jeans) desperately needs to be restored, particularity in this country.
That's the crossroads we're at, isn't it?
DeleteMuch of what you say is accurate and the course you're proposing is similar to proponents of the 'Benedict Option' which is essentially a strategic withdrawal from secular culture by building local resilient Christian communities. Pope Francis is proposing new forms of engagement by downplaying these more traditional approaches.
In a way, yes. I think that the Church is ill prepared for engagement with the world at the moment (although it wil still happen organically) and needs to regroup and heal and rediscover her first love. I don't think that necessarily means totally withdrawing into a parallel society but, on the other hand, when the early Fathers withdrew to the desert, people sought them out because 'a city set on a hill cannot be hidden'. There is something about genuinely holy people that is attractive, and it's not something that needs training and outreach programmes and lots of expenditure. It needs the much harder struggle of forming people and communities in personal holiness. At the moment, too many church communities only offer a replica of secular society - with all its egotism and partisanship - dressed up in vestments.
DeleteI'm not sure what these new forms of engagement would look like, it feels like I've been hearing about them my entire life and they always end up being underwhelming (or mini golf in the cathedral). Does the wheel really need to be reinvented? Prayer, humility, and works of charity. Quite the opposite of finding new forms of engagement, I've found that returning to one of the most ancient has been much more fruitful - I've had far more discussions about faith since I took vows to avoid people!
I think the central issue for Pope Francis (and before him Pope John Paul and Pope Benedict) is seeking out the 'lost sheep' of the Church and drawing them back to Christ. It seems to me then that certainly pastors need forming to do this and. For Pope Francis, as I tried to outline, this means starting where people are and making the faith attractive rather than a series of rules and doctrines.
DeleteWhat are you up to these days, Lain?
Yes, I think there's been too much emphasis on the academic qualifications of pastors and not enough on their ability to ... pastor. I wonder if the conveyor belt of Catholic High School to University to seminary really helps, so many men seem to enter the priesthood without much experience of real life, and are expected to help people through the challenges of married life, children, work, loss. Recourse to rules and doctrine is understandable, because it's much easier to tell the congregation to avoid X, Y and Z than it is to help each individual grow internally. I think that a return to the expectation (or requirement) of making confession before taking communion would be helpful, as well as normalising spiritual direction for the 'ordinary' lay folk, not just for those considering ordination or the religious life. But you need priests for this.
DeleteWhat am I up to? Not much :) I've just been plodding along with work and prayer and meditation. I'm enjoying the solitary life, although my commitments do take me out into the community a lot.
I recently discovered (while I was doing some very boring research into the western emulation of oriental pottery), that one of my ancestors visited the Royal Worcester factories in the 1870s as part of a tour of the UK during Japan's modernisation drive. (https://www.museumofroyalworcester.org/discover-learn/research/factories/royal-worcester-19th-century/). I've been thinking about reconstructing his route and walking and praying it as a kind of pilgrimage; partly for the discipline of roughing it and partly because I want to think through what I do next. I am tempted to return to Japan, I miss the mountains very much and long for the solitude there. And, if I'm totally honest, I'm a little scared of the way this country is heading and I'm not sure I'd feel entirely safe under the next government.
Alas, the sacrament of confession is much neglected these days.
DeleteSuch a walk to clear your head and seek God's guidance may be a good idea, Lain. Do you have a spiritual adviser to help you discern your next steps? Whatever you do decide, don't act from a sense of fear about this countries future. I can understand the draw towards natural beauty and serenity. We all need this in our lives.
I do, I have my abbot who gave me his blessing to live as a solitary. He s it's a good idea: the wandering holy (wo)man is a traditional figure in Orthodoxy (not that I'm anywhere near attaining that adjective), and it's also a tradition for Zen monks to make a walking pilgrimage, so I get to bring together both parts of my heritage.
DeleteI'm planning on begging as much accommodation as I can from churches and take a sleeping bag and bed roll for the rest. I don't much fancy sleeping under a hedge in this weather, so I'm thinking of the summer.
You're right about not acting out of fear, but the incoming government has already shown itself willing to be manipulated by extremists who are friends of neither women nor Christians, and I think we may have already gone past the point of no return.
Will a young Japanese princess be able to "rough it"?
DeleteBe sure to stock up on toilet rolls!
That's himesama to you!
DeleteYes, I hope so. It's all part of tearing down the bricks to rebuild with hewn stone.
You've made a lot of good points here Lain. I particularly agree with your statements that the churchs sex scandals have cut the legs away from evangelism for a generation and that the church doesn't understand the world around it. Like yourself I'm pessimistic as to the future. I see what's happening in Scotland ànd can the future, the world has gone mad at a speed I would never have expected.
DeleteAs I get older I become more anti left, but despair at the dumb headed stupidly of a large portion of the right.
Thanks, Clive. Yes, I'm also surprised how quickly the world has descended into madness. It's like everyone has been caught in a collective fever dream. I find myself holding views that would have been considered as quite boring and centralist a few years ago but which are now considered far right by those on the left and hopelessly liberal by those on the right: as you say, the right is increasingly becoming as mindless and tribal as the left. I have nobody to vote for. My fear is that things will either continue the way they are until we've sleepwalked straight into 1984, or there's going to be a massive and unpleasant backlash, and everyone chucking the term 'far right' around for anyone they dislike is going to find out what the real far right actually looks like. I'm not looking forward to either of those scenarios.
DeleteBtw I read your post about ethical investments and defence yesterday and thought you made a good argument. To my mind, 'ethical investments' are basically a money making scheme selling peace of mind to investors who don't really understand how investing works (it's such a tangled web that no investment is truly 'ethical'), and it conflates the sale of arms to questionable regimes with legitimate defence contracts, under the idealistic umbrella of 'war bad'.
I hope all is well with you and yours ❤️
Who would have thought we would be in a position that in some parts of the UK it would be a hate crime and to say a woman can't have a penis?
DeleteOr that leading politicians will decline too define what a woman is?
I hate the term woke as it's used lazily like fascist is, but wokism is the new fascism.
I'm ok thanks, things have been a bit difficult recently, but hopefully things are on the up!
Hope you are well and?
I know, it's complete ideological capture by a minute part of society. I feel like we're all living in one of those hidden camera shows, just waiting for someone to jump out and tell us it was just an experiment all along. Wokism is the application of the emotion of religion to quack science and psychology. I find it hugely ironic that the same people who rail against religion have introduced a new creed, heresies, inquisitions and infallible spokespeople. If it wasn't so serious, it would be funny.
DeleteI'm sorry to hear that things have been a bit difficult. I do keep all of our little blog community in my prayers, so do know you're in them. I'm ok, thanks, just feeling a bit restless, really. I've found the long dark winter particularly hard this year, and I think I might go loopy if the sun doesn't come out soon!
Unrelated -- In a "final correspondence" from Church Militant, date March 18th, the following statement was made
ReplyDelete"As you may have been made aware, there was an attempt to salvage jobs by our friends at TruthArmyFilms.com. Unfortunately, that endeavor was unable to get off the ground. Nonetheless, they have our utmost support that their mission may prove to be one of success, Truth and holiness."
It appears we've seen the last of CM.
Truth Army are themselves being sued for $2m ...
Deletehttps://wherepeteris.com/update-church-militant-shuts-down-or-did-it/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPw-3e_pzqU 🤔
DeleteI got the following from Prophecy Today:
ReplyDelete“*The Almighty’s displeasure*
An insight into YHWH’s opinion on the idea of seeking social acceptability in church matters may be found in this little episode: Pope Francis signed off the Fiducia Supplicans, allowing the blessing of same sex marriages, on December 18th, 2023. The previous day, the Pope’s birthday, lightning struck the statue of St Peter at the Sanctuary of Our Lady of the Rosary of San Nicolas in Argentina, the country of Francis’ birth. There were two statues at the church, St Peter and St Paul. Despite the presence of lightning rods around both statues, the halo of St Peter and the keys held in his right hand were destroyed, along with Peter’s hand. St Paul’s statue was untouched.”
Link: https://prophecytoday.uk/comment/society-politics/item/3063-1967-world-views-in-collision.html
https://seachurn.blogspot.com/2024/03/the-future-of-catholic-church.html
ReplyDeleteAn interesting read....The Future of the Catholic Church.....Cressida