This Question Shook John Paul II — Now Another Man Must Answer Christ’s Summons
From the New Catholic Register
The
greatest pre-conclave homily was preached by St. John Paul II in 1978, on the
Gospel where Christ asks Peter three times, ‘Do you love me?’ — the same Gospel
heard in churches around the world this Sunday.
Pope John Paul II prays during Mass at Etchmiadzin, Armenia, on Sept. 27, 2001.
On the Sunday
before the conclave begins, a good many cardinals will visit their “titular
churches” in Rome. This Sunday they will have a Gospel text that should inspire
their preaching as they ready themselves to elect a new pope.
The assigned
reading for this Sunday is John 21:1-19. Jesus asks Peter three times to
profess his love, and three times confers upon him the mission of caring for
the entire flock — “feed my lambs, tend my sheep.” As it is the assigned
reading for Sunday Mass all over the world, homilists everywhere will likely
preach about Peter’s primacy.
Every cardinal,
upon receiving the red hat, is assigned a church in Rome, becoming, as it were,
the local parish priest. He is not actually that, but the titular assignment
maintains an ancient tradition that a bishop is selected by the local clergy —
in this case, that the bishop of Rome is elected by the clergy of Rome. The
College of Cardinals expresses the universality of the entire Church; their
titular churches link them to the local diocese of Rome.
The
pre-conclave visits for Sunday Mass can create quite a commotion. The cardinals
who live far away from Rome rarely visit their titular churches, so any visit
can be something of a local event.
Given the
fevered atmosphere just before a conclave, the most prominent cardinals attract
an inflated congregation of supporters, curiosity-seekers and media. What did
the apparent front-runners say? Did it help or hurt their cause? What
preferences did the so-called kingmakers express? Were there intercessory
prayers in Mandarin? Were there prayers for persecuted Catholics? It can be a
bit of a spectacle.
John 21 is also
used at papal funerals. It was used for both Pope Francis and Pope St. John
Paul II. Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, who preached last week, barely took
notice of the Gospel passage in his formulaic homily rehearsing
the life of Pope Francis. The cardinals will certainly do better than that this
Sunday.
In 2005,
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger delivered a homiletic
masterpiece at John Paul’s funeral, built around the final words of
Jesus to Peter: Follow me! One hopes the cardinalatial preachers can approach
Cardinal Ratzinger’s heights this Sunday.
The greatest of
all pre-conclave homilies was preached on that very text, John 21, in October
1978. Blessed John Paul I had died after only 33 days, and the stunned
cardinals gathered for the second conclave that year.
After arriving
in Rome, the Polish cardinals offered a Holy Mass for the late pope. Cardinal
Stefan Wyszyński, primate of Poland, was the principal celebrant, and Cardinal
Karol Wojtyła, archbishop of Kraków, preached the homily on the conversation
between Jesus and Peter.
There is no
video of the occasion and it was largely unknown until papal biographer George
Weigel included it in Witness to Hope, the 1999 biography of John
Paul II. Weigel discovered it in the Kalendarium życia Karola Wojtyła,
an exhaustive pre-papal chronology compiled by Adam Boniecki.
With
near-mystical quality, the future pope preached that day about his immediate
predecessor, John Paul I, and his first predecessor, St. Peter:
The
succession of Peter, the summons to the office of the papacy, always contains
within it a call to the highest love, to a very special love. And always, when
Christ says to a man, ‘Come, follow me,’ He asks him what He asked of Simon:
‘Do you love me more than these?’”
The question at
the heart of every vocation is the same: “Do you love me?” But the Petrine
office, to be the Vicar of Christ, is so terrifying, that the heart cannot bear
the weight. Cardinal Wojtyła again:
Then
the heart of man must tremble. The heart of Simon trembled, and the heart of
Albino Luciani, before he took the name John Paul I, trembled. A human heart
must tremble, because in the question there is also a demand. You must love!
You must love more than the others do, if the entire flock of sheep is to be
entrusted to you, if the charge, ‘Feed my lambs, feed my sheep’ is to reach the
scope which it reaches in the calling and mission of Peter.
It is a truly
remarkable passage. On the threshold of the papacy in 1978, Cardinal Wojtyła
already felt the weight of the call — a weight too heavy for the heart of man.
The Polish cardinal’s heart no doubt trembled. In order for the Church to
receive the gift of Peter, one man must be willing to pay the price. Peter paid
that price with his life, crucified upon the Vatican hill.
Cardinal
Wojtyła’s homily again:
Christ
speaks enigmatic words, He says them to Peter: ‘When you were younger, you
girded yourself and went where you wanted. But when you grow old, someone else
will gird you and lead you where you do not want to go.’ Mysterious and
enigmatic words. … And so in this summons, directed to Peter by Christ after
His Resurrection, Christ’s command, ‘Come follow me,’ has a double meaning. It
is a summons to service, and a summons to die …
Just days
later, that summons would fall upon Cardinal Karol Wojtyła of Kraków. As all
popes are, he was asked in the conclave: “Do you accept your election?” He was
really being asked, in the Sistine Chapel, before Michelangelo’s immense Christ
the Judge: “Do you love me more that these?”
Twenty-five
years later, in October 2003, at the silver jubilee of the pontificate, John
Paul II returned
to John 21:
Every
day the dialogue between Jesus and Peter takes place in my heart. In spirit, I
fix my gaze on the Risen Christ. He, well aware of my human fragility,
encourages me to respond with trust as Peter did: “Lord, you know everything;
you know that I love you” (John 21:17). And then He invites me to assume the
responsibilities which He himself has entrusted to me.
In his long
pontificate, when John Paul spoke of his papal office, he preferred the text of
Luke 22:32. Jesus, predicting Peter’s denial, assures him that he has prayed
for him that his “faith may not fail” and that Peter will return and have the
mission of strengthening the others in their faith. Less frequently did John
Paul take up the more well-known Petrine passages in Matthew 16 and John 21.
But in John Paul’s internal life of prayer with the Lord, it was the
conversation of John 21 that accompanied him always.
At John Paul’s
great funeral Mass in 2005, Cardinal Ratzinger placed the entire pontificate
with the context of John 21:
In
the first years of his pontificate, still young and full of energy, the Holy
Father [John Paul II] went to the very ends of the earth, guided by Christ. But
afterwards, he increasingly entered into the communion of Christ’s sufferings;
increasingly he understood the truth of the words: ‘Someone else will fasten a
belt around you.’ And in this very communion with the suffering Lord,
tirelessly and with renewed intensity, he proclaimed the Gospel, the mystery of
that love which goes to the end (cf. John 13:1).
In conferring
the primacy upon Peter, Jesus placed it within the mystery of love. A love so
deep and broad that the heart of man can hardly contain it. Thus the heart
trembles.
On Sunday, for
many of the cardinals, the homily will be their final public words before the
conclave begins on Wednesday. Then, for one man, the summons will approach, and
the heart will tremble.
A nicely reverent and informative piece - I didn't know about the cardinals' pre-conclave activities in Rome. This time around, the world rather holds its breath as to which direction the Roman Catholic church will take with the selection of its new leader. I've even heard one commentator pray that it won't be a unifying managerial type, but instead either an uncompromising conservative (to "fix things") or the wildest of liberals (to fully expose "the cracks" and let the faithful then move on somehow... I wasn't quite sure how though).
ReplyDeleteGadjo
My heart is still trembling having just heard that the President of the USA posted an A1 photo of himself as the new Pope on his facebook as a joke. Outrageous and ignorant behaviour from a Head of State. A significant number of his election votes were from Catholics. Now that he has been successfully re-elected, they are in no doubt knowing what he really thinks of them. Shame on both !. ..Cressida
ReplyDeletePersonally, I found it hilarious. Sorry, but I just do. Maybe it's because the cardinals are such an uninspiring lot, almost all modernists, with a few exceptions like Sarah and Mueller. I can't help feeling that, despite his scandalous personal and business life to date, Trump really would be no worse than most of them.
DeleteI agree, Cressie; the 'man' (I use the word loosely) is a buffoon.
DeleteYes, I wouldn't worry, I think the man has a sense if humour! (You won't thank me for the reminder, but the alternative, of course, was a practicing "Roman Catholic" who was avidly "pro-choice"... just like the chap who is now running Canada).
DeleteBoth unfit for the Presidency - which just shows the state of America!
DeleteSo, apparently, the Chinese Communist Party have now taken advantage of the interregnum to appoint a so-called "bishop" under Francis's agreement with Peking (no, I'm not going to call it "Beijing." I'm not Chinese.) Should tell you how efficacious the entire "spirit of Vatican II" philosophy of engaging with the world has been. Hopefully, Francis was the last "hippie" and that whole "trendy priest" thing will die with him.
ReplyDeleteThe original "trendy priest" was of course Dermot Morgan, a.k.a. Father Ted:
Deletehttps://youtu.be/ttgBMtNdChs?feature=shared
Indeed cringeworthy. Not Dermot Morgan, but the kind of priest he was taking the specimen from. They were amazingly common in Ireland of the time. I remember them only too well. Thankfully, most of them have either passed on or left the Church and got married to an equally trendy nun. Let's hope we don't see their like again.
DeleteSurely this is the long-awaited sequel to The Blues Brothers. Pope Elwood I, raised in the slums of Chicago, is on a mission from God to get the band back together.
Delete🤣
DeleteI expect that it'll be only a matter of time till Bono gives him a pair of the requisite sunglasses... Hope you are well, Cheffers!
Gadjo.
And yet the Vatican official generally identified as the prime mover behind the one-sided Vatican-China deal, none other than Pope Francis's Secretary of State, Card. Pietro Parolin, is now widely tipped as his most likely successor. Very strange. They might as well elect Inspector Clouseau.
ReplyDeleteYou know what they say, Ray. He who enters the conclave a pope...
DeleteI hope you’re right, Bell, at least as far as Parolin is concerned.
DeleteDamian Thompson’s final pre-conclave wrapup in The Spectator takes aim at several cardinals who have been widely acclaimed as “papabili”, notably Card. Parolin, Card. Prevost, and Card. Tagle, including this:
ReplyDeleteTagle’s all-singing, all-dancing charisma, which plays well in Manila, makes him seem a slightly comic figure in the West. Cardinals will not have forgotten that Pope Francis sacked him without explanation from his role as head of the giant Catholic charity Caritas.
https://archive.ph/njMF5
From what I’ve seen online, the times to start looking out for the smoke signals are 10:30 and 12:00 in the morning session and then 5:30 and 7:00 in the afternoon/ evening (local time in Rome).
ReplyDeleteCan others confirm this or, if not, pass on any alternative suggestions?
There's this:
Deletehttps://ewtn.co.uk/article-conclave-schedule-what-time-does-the-smoke-appear/
Thank you, @Lain. There seems to have been a slight change to the rules. No black smoke now after the first morning vote and the first afternoon vote. They wait until after the second round of voting and then burn both lots of ballot sheets together.
DeleteUnless, of course, there has been a winner. In that case the election is over and we see the white smoke.
White smoke spotted, apparently...
DeleteHabemus papum. But who is it?
ReplyDeleteLeo XIV
DeleteOne has been longing to hear Latin in a Chicago accent..
DeleteThe press seem to think that Leo XIV is likely to follow in Francis' footsteps. Does anyone know much about him?
ReplyDeleteNobody seems to know much about him at all, not even on an American Catholic website where I've been following today's events. He is described as middle of the road, but in what sense, exactly,. I have yet to find out.
ReplyDeleteI don't even know how to pronounce his surname. He is apparently of French descent. Does that mean he pronounces it "prévôt" or does he Anglicise it, rhyming with Three Lost?
His choice of name suggests he wishes to honour the memory of Leo XIII, who (so I have just learnt in this same connection) is mainly remembered for two things. (1) The importance he attached to the Church’s social policy, which would place him on the progressive side. (2) His devotion to the rosary, which would place him on the trad side.
DeleteAmerican news channels seem to be going with 'pray-voast' (rhyming with toast).
DeleteHe does, so far, seem to fully align with neither the liberals or the conservatives, which is interesting.
I think the name is a good sign.
Delete@ Ray -- Leo XIII's development of Catholic social policy was in direct reaction to thr rise of socialism, so I'm greatly encouraged by that choice of name. Let's hope my optimism is justified.
Delete@Bell
ReplyDeleteI think the name is a good sign.
So do I.
@Lain
He does, so far, seem to fully align with neither the liberals or the conservatives,
And I see that as a good sign, as well.
“For you I am a bishop; but with you I am a Christian.”
ReplyDelete(Pope Leo XIV)
Fr. Frank Pavone (who wouldn't necessarily be keen on having a 2nd Francis) may put minds at rest when he says that the new pope is well known to have zeal for missionary work and pro-life activities and that he is sound doctrinally:
ReplyDeletehttps://rumble.com/v6t5fjr-father-frank-pavone-says-new-pope-is-going-to-be-solid.html
I wonder if everyone going to conclave has their papal name secretly picked out, or if they suddenly have to choose. It's going to take a while to get used to talking about a Pope Leo that's not in a historical context.
ReplyDeleteI do think the choice of name is significant, because the new pope is not just aligning himself with the previous Leo XIII, but with a long line of Leos stretching back to the 5th century. In retrospect, Francis' choice of papal name was a signifier that he was 'something new'. Another Leo suggests someone rooted in the tradition of the Church (prior to the Schism, as well), who might not sit so lightly to being creative with it.
I've seen online conservatives decrying him as 'another woke pope' and online progressives decrying him as a 'disaster' for their cause. This makes me cautiously optimistic: faith should never align entirely along partisan lines.
Of course, this post might age like milk, but I will be praying for Pope Leo as he takes on this unimaginable responsibility at a very difficult time.
There are certain signs we can start looking out for that ought to gjve us an idea of which way the wind is blowing. Six signs altogether, in the form of two questions to be answered in connection with each of three names. The names are:
ReplyDelete• Card. Pietro Parolin, Secretary of State since August 2013
• Card. Arthur Roche, Prefect of the Dicastery for Divine Worship since May 2021
• Card. Victor Manuel Fernández, Prefect of the Dicastery of the Doctrine of the Faith since July 2023
For each of the three, the first question is: how long will he remain in his present position?
And the second question: when the time comes to replace him, who will Pope Leo pick as his replacement?
I posted this same comment on an American Catholic forum, where within one minute a reply appeared:
DeleteOh you KNOW darn well that Roche is going straight out the door.
Fernandez might stick around for a short bit. Not sure about Parolin.
Yeah, I'd take a very unchristian delight in Roche being recycled.
DeleteMe too. Also Fernandez, I have to confess.
DeleteIn Parolin's case it's nothing personal. I just think the Vatican needs to get that China business sorted out, and keeping Parolin in place at the Secretariat of State surely makes that more difficult.