‘Peace through Strength' and 'The Causes of War'
Introduction
America struck Iran's nuclear enrichment facility located 300 feet under a mountain AT Fordo with six 30,000-pound “bunker buster bombs," last night. Iran’s other nuclear facilities were attacke with 30 Tomahawk missiles launched by American submarines some 400 miles away.
![]() |
Donald Trump’s address to American Nation
A short time ago, the US
military carried out massive precision strikes on the three key nuclear
facilities in the Iranian regime: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.
Everybody heard those names
for years as they built this horribly destructive enterprise. Our objective was
the destruction of Iran’s nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear
threat posed by the world’s number one state sponsor of terror.
Tonight, I can report to the
world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran’s key nuclear
enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the
bully of the Middle East, must now make peace.
If they do not, future attacks
will be far greater and a lot easier.
For 40 years, Iran has been
saying, “Death to America, death to Israel”.
They have been killing our
people, blowing off their arms, blowing off their legs with roadside bombs –
that was their speciality.
We lost over a thousand
people, and hundreds of thousands throughout the Middle East and around the
world have died as a direct result of their hate, in particular, so many were
killed by their general,
I decided a long time ago that
I would not let this happen.
Sign up for Al Jazeera
Americas Coverage Newsletter
US politics, Canada’s
multiculturalism, South America’s geopolitical rise—we bring you the stories
that matter.
It will not continue.
I want to thank and
congratulate Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu.
We worked as a team like
perhaps no team has ever worked before, and we’ve gone a long way to erasing
this horrible threat to Israel.
I want to thank the Israeli
military for the wonderful job they’ve done and, most importantly, I want to
congratulate the great American patriots who flew those magnificent machines
tonight, and all of the United States military on an operation the likes of
which the world has not seen in many, many decades.
Hopefully, we will no longer
need their services in this capacity. I hope that’s so. I also want to
congratulate the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan “Razin”
Caine – spectacular general – and all of the brilliant military minds involved
in this attack.
With all of that being said,
this cannot continue.
There will be either peace or
there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last
eight days.
Remember, there are many
targets left. Tonight’s was the most difficult of them all by far, and perhaps
the most lethal, but if peace does not come quickly, we will go after those
other targets with precision, speed and skill. Most of them can be taken out in
a matter of minutes.
There’s no military in the
world that could have done what we did tonight, not even close. There has never
been a military that could do what took place just a little while ago.
Tomorrow, General Caine,
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, will have a press conference at 8am (12:00
GMT) at the Pentagon, and I want to just thank everybody, and in particular,
God.
I want to just say, “We love
you, God, and we love our great military. Protect them.” God bless the Middle
East. God bless Israel, and God bless America.
Thank you very much.
Thank
you.
Benjamin Netanyahu's statement
Congratulations, President Trump.
Your bold decision to target Iran’s nuclear facilities, with the awesome and righteous might of the United States, will change history.
America has done what no other country on earth could do.
President Trump and I often say, ‘Peace through strength.’
First comes strength, then comes peace.
And tonight, Donald Trump and the United States acted with a lot of strength.
History will record that President Trump acted to deny the world’s most
dangerous regime the world’s most dangerous weapons.”
Iranian Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi response:
The events of this morning are shocking and shameful, and will have lasting [everlasting] consequences.
The U.S. has engaged in extremely dangerous, illegal and criminal behaviour - continuing grave violations of the UN Charter, international law and the Nuclear Non‑Proliferation Treaty.
The United States reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interests,
and people.
We categorically reject this act of aggression and will pursue all legal
avenues, including an emergency meeting at the UN Security Council.
This reckless strike occurred during an ongoing diplomatic process—betraying diplomacy and supporting the aggressive actions of the genocidal and lawless Israeli regime.
By completing this chain of violations, the U.S. has itself launched a
dangerous war against Iran.
Iran will resist with full force against U.S. military aggression and the
crimes committed by this rogue regime, in defence of our security and national
interests.”
Winston Churchill - The Causes of War
Delivered during Churchill’s “wilderness years” (1929–1939),
he challenged prevailing appeasement policies and warned Britain of the growing
Nazi threat.
Many people think that the best
way to escape war is to dwell upon its horrors, to imprint them vividly upon
the minds of the younger generation. They flaunt the grizzly photographs before
their eyes; they fill their ears with tales of carnage; they dilate upon the
ineptitude of generals and admirals; they denounce the crime and insensate
folly of human nature. But how would that avert war if we were attacked or
invaded ourselves?
For history shows on many a page
that armaments are not necessarily a cause of war, and that the want of them is
no guarantee of peace. Indeed, the lucid intervals of peace and order in human
history have only occurred after armaments in the hands of strong governments
have come into being. Civilisation has been nursed only in cradles guarded by
superior weapons and discipline.
As we go to and fro in this peaceful island, with its decent ordinary people going about their business under free institutions, and with so much tolerance and fair play in their laws and customs, it is startling and fearful to realise that we are no longer safe in our island home. After all, only a few hours away by air there dwell a nation of nearly seventy millions of the most educated, industrious, scientific, disciplined people in the world, who are being taught from childhood to think of war as a glorious exercise and death in battle as the noblest fate for man.
There is a nation which has abandoned all its liberties in order to augment its collective might. There is a nation … in the grip of a group of ruthless men preaching a gospel of intolerance and racial pride, unrestrained by law, by Parliament or by public opinion. From their new table of commandments they have omitted: 'Thou shalt not kill.' I am afraid that if you look intently at what is moving towards us, peace can be founded only upon preponderance. There is safety in numbers.
Only a few hours' flight away, in the air we are within shattering distance of the great aerodromes of central Europe. So close as that! Is it prudent, is it possible—however much we might desire it—to turn our backs on Europe and ignore what may happen there?
We must, without another hour’s delay, begin to make ourselves, at least, the strongest air power in the European world. Peace must be founded upon preponderance. There is safety in numbers. May God protect us all.
What a good idea it was to include that Churchill quote. Thank you for that, Jack.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, is Fordow now well and truly a ruin, or isn't it? Can we know for certain that the "bunker buster" bombs really got all the way down?
In a word, no. We don't even know if the Iranians were still keeping the nuclear enrichment material there. As a Trump fan, I'm greatly disappointed by his involvement. He had a chance to get AIPAC out of American politics, and he bungled it. We all know what the Iranian regime is, but I had hoped Trump wasn't as stupid as he sometimes acts and could see through the Israelis. I guess I overestimated him.
DeleteI'm far from being Trump fan; I think he's a narcissist with sociopathic tendencies. However, i think his action here is correct. There are similarities in the world today to those leading to WWII. The Iranian regime needs to be put down.
DeleteI used a quote from Reagan deliberately. At its heart, peace through strength means a nation best preserves peace by demonstrating its capacity and readiness to defend itself. When adversaries see that a country is strong - militarily, economically, and morally - they are less likely to provoke it. Like Churchill, he understood appeasement or showing weakness invites aggression.
The havoc being caused by Iranian proxies (Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis, needs removing.
This drives regional instability, civil wars, and humanitarian crises there. It's links with North Korea and China, and increasingly with Russia, is something that can no longer be ignored. Diplomacy with such regimes is simply a dishonest dance.
As for the (Dis)United Nations - this is a joke.
I don't think we (that is, the West) should be getting involved in every foreign conflict going. However, as we've chosen to do so, I feel safer knowing that Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons. The Iranian regime views America and the UK as satanic.
DeleteNuclear weapons are effective deterrents because of the threat of mutually assured destruction. That goes out of the window when you're dealing with a regime run by fundamentalists who view martyrdom as a reward. All security assumptions have to be rewritten for Islamist terror: when the IRA planted devices, they generally tried not to be caught up in it themselves (which is why luggage is removed from a plane if the passenger doesn't board). This changes if being caught in your own detonation is not just acceptable but desirable.
I don't like where this is heading, but I don't think there was a realistic choice.
Is there a ceasefire or isn’t there? We’re still seeing conflicting reports.
ReplyDeleteDoes it mean government authority has broken down in Iran? Is one senior official telling Qatar that Iran has accepted its terms, while another senior official is still ordering missile attacks on Israeli territory?
What concerns me is this acceptance almost, that a war is inevitable. To me that's not acceptable. Our politicians need to try harder. If they believe this why are they playing at re-arming. Why aren't they promising 10,% by five years.
ReplyDeleteWhat are they doing to actively avoid this horror. They should be showing more urgency.
Over dependence on the military might of the USA - remember how Carl used to go on about this?
DeleteWas Carl in the military? He never said 😇
DeleteWar is inevitable for as long as we ignore the image of God in others and kill them. And for as long as war is profitable.
@HJ Yes that has been a problem. But I don't think relevant to the question I'm asking. Why are so many politicians, Generals etc taking such a defeatist view? War should not be accepted without someone trying very hard to avoid it.
Delete@Lain
DeleteYes again true. War is inevitable. However most individual wars could have been avoided with some effort.
The claim that profit is a strong influence on wars happening isn't an argument I find convincing.
Wars are generally started by people who don't have to fight in them, and those people tend to be selfish, greedy and egotistical, so they don't see a particular need to avoid war. Their ambitions are encouraged by those around them who profit from war, either through advancement or material gain (looting, land grabs and arms sales are huge business). Even back in the Crusader age, knights joined the crusades as much to make their fortune as for any religious motivation.
DeleteYes this is correct. In the end it's all about greed, land grabs, power and money. I think the majority of ordinary people would prefer to live in peace as they are the gun fodder for wars when they occur. Historically mankind has always been at war. Something momentous and miraculous has to occur to stop it all. Christian software implanted into the psyche should be achieving this but it has strong opposing forces.Sadly a lot of them posing as Christians Maybe the world would be in a lot worse state without Christian ethos. Just as well Jesus arrived on the scene when he did. There is a solution but big changes would need to be made. I believe in the power of prayer. Prayer en masse might help.
Delete@Lain
ReplyDeleteWas Carl in the military? He never said 😇
Yes, he had been, and for quite a long time, I think. He alluded to it occasionally though, as far as I recall, only in very general terms, nothing specific.
It would be interesting to see what Carl has to say now about Trump and the Twelve Day War. He was an anti-Trump Republican, back in the long distant Cranmer era.
Having over the years had many Jewish and Iranian friends, I find it hard to comment. But it’s interesting to read what people here have to say.
ReplyDeleteThe issue isn't with ordinary folk - it's with their leaders. It always is; and will always be so.
DeleteIndeed, it's the same with the Russia/Ukraine conflict. We have many good Russians and Ukrainians in our churches, who have no issue with each other.
DeleteThis 'Catholic' LibDem MP is deeply upset that he's being denied communion after voting for the assisted dying bill, despite being warned that he'd be denied communion if he voted for the assisted dying bill. It's nice to see a priest with a backbone, IMO.
ReplyDeletehttps://observer.co.uk/news/national/article/priest-denies-mp-holy-communion-over-his-support-for-assisted-dying-bill
The Spectator’s Stephen Daisley comes down firmly on the side of the priest against the politician.
Deletehttps://archive.ph/evIFu
The most upsetting thing about of all of this is this consistent attempt to change Catholic teaching which every Catholic should understand is immutable. The deeply upset Catholic MP knows he cannot receive Holy Communion unless he is in the state of Grace ( without sin) Hopefully he knows euthanasia and abortion will never be accepted by the Church but wants to change things anyhow because he likes the idea of being a Catholic , that or he is anti Catholic and is attempting to undermine and destroy the Church which is a clever way of doing it.A priest who gives Holy Communion to a known supporter of these sinful anti Catholic practices knows he himself is committing a mortal/grave sin which excommunicates one automatically from the fold until you repent atone confess with the intention of never repeating the sin again.
ReplyDeleteIt is all clear and simple. The Catholic priest has no option if he seriously considers his role as a Catholic priest. In the article it said that the MP got a lot of support and sympathy from the Catholic parishioners. Some serious attention needs to be addressed in regard to Catholic dogma from the pulpit. If it means less donations and a smaller Church...so be it. There has to be a fortress of unwavering integrity and Christian morality and all that that entails in this ever increasing corrupt and Godless world and that is what the Catholic Church is supposed to represent.
I agree, it's a normalisation of the idea that the Church teaches X, but what Catholics really believe is Y (as in the constant pushing of statistics about how many Catholics use contraception). Although I don't think the Church has helped itself of late by being so lax on disciplining high profile Catholics who've taken moral positions contrary to Church teaching. It then comes as a shock to people when a priest puts his foot down. I hope we see more of this: discipline is medicinal and this MP needs to repent (or find a church better suited to his beliefs).
DeleteThe irony here is that the LibDems are some of the most censorious of the lot when it comes to transgressing progressive dogma (they hounded out Tim Farron because of his faith). I'm sure this MP would be demanding the expulsion of any MP who questioned the LGBT movement, the 'Climate Catastrophe', or who failed to make due obeisance to 'Our NHS'.
The ever-observant Anton reports that Adrian Hilton’s old archbishopcranmer.com site has now been replenished with quite a number of His Grace’s old articles, though without any of the comments threads.
ReplyDeleteSome of the missing articles have to do with Christ Church Oxford, which was what evidently led to legal threats to close it, but there are articles on other subjects that are still missing, too. The most recent ones are dated March 2020, which was more than two years before the final curtain.
Off topic, but Diane Montagna has produced and interesting report on Traditionis Custodes.
ReplyDeletehttps://substack.com/home/post/p-167259174
It’s not yet two months since Pope Leo’s election. There hasn’t been time yet for him to show his hand in the battle of the liturgies, but from what little we have learnt so far about his ideas, it looks to me as though he was going to make a move of that kind anyway, sooner or later, without any prompting from Diane Montagna.
DeleteThe U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear challenges to state laws barring men (the so-called “trans women”) from competing in women’s sports.
ReplyDeleteReport in the NYTimes, not behind the usual paywall:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/03/us/politics/supreme-court-transgender-athletes.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20250703&instance_id=157784&nl=breaking-news®i_id=76239699&segment_id=201171&user_id=69e1bab46473bbbdb9371d2229cfdcfb