Three Paths Through the Wilderness: Reflections on Responses to Cultural Crises
An old man's thoughts on the choices facing the faithful.
Introduction
"You are the salt of the earth... You are the light of
the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden. Nor do they light a lamp and
then put it under a bushel basket" (Matthew 5:13-15).
In my lifetime, I've witnessed sincere Christians explore
distinct paths through cultural hostility or indifference. Each claims fidelity
to Christ's call to be salt and light, yet these paths seem to diverge,
sometimes sharply.
So, I find myself returning to three images Jesus gave
us—salt, light, and a city on a hill—as I watch His people wrestle with how to
live in an increasingly secular, chaotic age. Salt must mingle with what it
preserves, yet it can lose its savour. Light must shine in the dark, yet it can
be hidden under a bushel, or burn so fiercely that it blinds. A city on a hill
cannot hide; it is set inescapably before the watching world, for glory or for
shame.
Together, these metaphors sketch the paradox of Christian
presence in the world.
The Three Paths
The Way of Authority
Some Christians, surveying the cultural crisis in the West,
conclude that being a "city on a hill" means seizing the high
ground—literally and figuratively. They hear in Jesus's words a summons to
visible, institutional Christianity, determining society's laws and customs.
Modern Forms:
- Evangelical
Dominionism: "Christians should exercise dominion over all
spheres—politics, education, media, law. The city must govern the
valley."
- Catholic
Integralism: "Civil authority should be influenced by and
subordinated to spiritual authority. The city on the hill must be
explicitly Catholic in its ordering."
This approach takes seriously the "cannot be
hidden" of Jesus's teaching. Why build a city and be powerless? If
Christians have the truth about human flourishing, shouldn't that truth
determine the shape of public policy?
I understand this hunger. When I witness children adrift in
confusion, families fractured, and truth itself trampled underfoot, something
deep within me yearns for a city mighty enough to shelter and shepherd. Surely
visibility calls for authority?
But I have seen how the hunger for institutional power
corrodes witness. When the city towers as fortress rather than sanctuary, it is
visible indeed—but for the wrong reasons. Can a kingdom of love be built by the
arm of force?
The Way of Preservation
Other Christians hear "city on a hill" and
conclude that visibility need not mean power. Rather, it means building
luminous communities whose quiet holiness cannot be ignored. It means building
beautiful, authentic Christian communities that serve as beacons of hope in a
darkening world.
Modern Forms:
- A
Smaller Church: A purified, humble Church—a visible but small city
whose light shines more clearly when stripped of worldly ambition—that
sustains its dwellers and draws people through its radiance.
Here, visibility flows not from scale or might, but from
beauty, distinctiveness, and holiness. A constellation of lamps in a forgotten
village may pierce the darkness more surely than the diffused glow of a
sprawling metropolis.
Yet wisdom shimmers in this path. Monasteries that draw
pilgrims from the earth's corners, parishes celebrated for liturgy and mercy,
homes that burn bright with welcome—these incarnate the way of preservation.
Their walls are not ramparts, but hearthstones that cannot be hidden.
Yet I wonder: did Jesus envision His city as primarily a
dwelling for the convinced? Can a lamp fulfil its purpose if it shines only for
those already gathered in its glow? Can such a city offer refuge to those still
wandering in the valley below?
The Way of Engagement
A third way envisions the "city on a hill" as
sanctuary and summons. Its gates stand forever open; its lamps burn through the
long watches for every wandering soul.
Such a city attracts because it offers radical hospitality,
recognising neighbours—even secular ones—as fellow image-bearers seeking truth.
It works for the common good without making politics its idol. It opens doors,
sets tables, and calls the lost home.
This missionary response gathers all three metaphors: it
preserves like salt, illumines like light, and stands as a visible city that
threatens no one—it invites all.
This way whispers closest to the Gospel's heart: intricate,
humble, unadorned by worldly glory. It promises not conquest, but
companionship; not dominion, but communion.
Yet even here, shadows gather. Can distinctiveness survive
with gates flung wide? A city that embraces all must guard against becoming
tasteless—luminous perhaps, but bland, its salt dissolved in the flood of
endless accommodation.
Living the Tension
What I've Learned
Through the years, I've come to see that each path captures
something essential about Christian discipleship, and each casts its own
shadow. The question isn't which path is perfect, but how to learn from all
three while avoiding their pitfalls.
The Christians who stir my soul weave together threads from
every path:
- The
conviction of those who seek authority—tempered by humility, not
domination.
- The
authenticity of those who preserve—tempered by openness, not withdrawal.
- The
charity of those who engage—tempered by fidelity, not compromise.
They know that to be salt and light requires both courage
and tenderness, both clarity and compassion—iron wrapped in velvet, truth
spoken in love.
Closing Reflection
Jesus called his followers to be salt and light in the
world. He never promised His followers this would be simple or safe. Salt that
preserves risks losing its flavour; light that shines risks being snuffed or
scorned. But hidden salt and shuttered lamps, an "invisible
Christianity," serve no one. We are called to offer hope to a world
desperate for truth and mercy.
The path forward may not lie in choosing one way but in
learning to walk all three: standing firm when truth lies trampled, building
beauty when the world grows gray, reaching out when neighbors wander lost.
Perhaps in this season, the Body of Christ needs many pilgrims on many paths,
their diverse gifts woven into one luminous witness.
Theological Postscript: The Paths Ahead
For those interested in understanding the theological
foundations beneath these reflections, the Church's recent teaching provides
helpful guidance on when different approaches might be appropriate.
The Conciliar Foundation
The Second Vatican Council recognised that Christians must
discern how to live Jesus' call to be salt, light, and city contextually. In
Gaudium et Spes, the Council describes the Church as "existing in the
world" yet summoned to "carry forward the work of Christ,"
bringing the Gospel's "healing and elevating impact on human dignity"
to society.
Crucially, the Council called for discernment. The Church
must "read the signs of the times and interpret them in the light of the
Gospel," applying principles of subsidiarity and enculturation. This means
the Church should "foster and take to herself, insofar as they are good,
the ability, resources, and customs of each people."
This pastoral vision supports all three paths we've
explored. The choice between them is a matter of prudential judgment, not
doctrine. The Council affirms that the Church's influence flows not from
"external dominion exercised by merely human means," but through
faith and charity that adapts to local needs and possibilities [1].
Papal Perspectives on Engagement
Recent popes have emphasised different aspects of this
discernment process, reflecting, in their teaching, the three paths.
John Paul II stressed that Christian authority must serve
human dignity rather than seek power for its own sake. In Centesimus Annus, he
warned against strategies that pursue influence as an end in itself [2]. His
guidance to American bishops emphasised "the Church's mission in the
social order must respect human dignity and religious freedom" [3]. This
provides support for the Way of Authority only when exercised through Gospel
ethics rather than seeking worldly power.
Benedict XVI offered prophetic caution about institutional
influence, anticipating a Church that might become "smaller" in
cultural influence but more spiritually authentic in witness [4]. In Deus
Caritas Est, he insisted that "the Church's deepest nature is expressed in
her three-fold responsibility of proclaiming the word of God, celebrating the
sacraments, and exercising the ministry of charity" [5]. His warning
against purely institutional approaches that lose spiritual focus reflects the
wisdom of the Way of Preservation when cultural engagement risks persecution or
corrupting Christian testimony.
Pope Francis in Evangelii Gaudium, emphasised that the
Church must be missionary, joyful, and relational, critiquing both aggressive
secularism and a Church that overly identifies with political power [6]. In
Fratelli Tutti, he writes that the Christian apostolic work is about dialogue:
"approaching, speaking, listening, looking at, coming to know and
understand one another, and to find common ground" [7].
These papal teachings converge on a key insight: the need
for prudential assessment of local circumstances, adopting different aspects of
Christian presence while maintaining unity on fundamental Gospel principles.
Discernment in Practice
Pilgrims must carry different tools for shifting terrain.
Sometimes we need the shepherd's staff of authority to guide others to safety.
Sometimes we need the steady flame of witness to hold back encroaching
darkness. Sometimes we need the open hand of hospitality to welcome the
stranger home.
Rather than prescribing one path, the Church's wisdom lies
in helping local communities discern which approach—or creative combinations of
each—best serves their missionary calling. The Church's emphasis on synodality
provides a concrete framework for this discernment, allowing communities to
prayerfully consider their response while maintaining communion with the
universal Church.
In post-Christian Western societies with strong democratic
traditions, the Way of Engagement may offer the most fruitful approach. In
cultures where Christian institutions retain significant influence, the Way of
Authority might be more appropriate. In societies experiencing rapid
secularisation or active hostility toward faith, the Way of Preservation may be
the wisest choice for sustaining Gospel witness across generations.
Wisdom for the Journey
The Preacher reminds us that "to everything there is a
season, and a time for every purpose under heaven" (Ecclesiastes 3:1).
What remains constant is the call to authentic presence:
maintaining Christian distinctiveness while supporting the human community;
proclaiming truth while embodying love; and being visible witnesses to hope
that comes from Christ alone. The specific expression may vary, but this
fundamental calling endures across all times, places, and seasons.
Some seasons call for the clarity from those in authority,
not to dominate, but to serve the common good. Other seasons demand the patient
work of preservation, building communities of beauty and virtue that can
weather storms and draw seekers by their light. Still other seasons require the
open-hearted engagement of those who cross boundaries to find common ground
with neighbours.
In our complex world, the universal Church's role is not to
prescribe identical responses everywhere for all times but to provide
principles for genuine discernment in local communities that choose their path
in service to the Gospel's transforming power.
What I've learned in my years of watching is this: the most
compelling Christians embody elements from all three ways. They understand that
there is a time for the conviction of those who seek authority, but without the
will to dominate. A time for the authenticity of those who preserve, but
without complete withdrawal. A time for the charity of those who engage, but
without losing their distinctiveness.
Pilgrims must prepare for every terrain on the journey
toward the City of God. The landscape shifts with the seasons, but our
destination remains fixed—the Eternal City, where all our labors find their
rest, where earthly cities fade before something infinitely greater.
"I do not ask that you take them out of the world but
that you keep them from the evil one. They do not belong to the world any more
than I belong to the world. Consecrate them in the truth. Your word is truth.
As you sent me into the world, so I sent them into the world." (John 17:
15-18)
Footnotes
- Second Vatican Council, Gaudium
et Spes (Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern
World), (1965), 22.
- John Paul II, Centesimus Annus (The
Hundredth Year), (1991), 24.
- John Paul II, Fides et Ratio (On
the Relationship between Faith and Reason), (1998), 1.
- Benedict XVI, Spe Salvi (On
Christian Hope), (2007), 22–25
- Benedict XVI, Caritas in
Veritate (Charity in Truth), (2009), 1.
- Francis, Evangelii Gaudium (The
Joy of the Gospel), (2013), 47.
- Francis Fratelli Tutti
Gadjo tries to summarize HJ's ecclesiastical solutions to current issues (this post seems intended for Roman Catholics but he will do his best). The church can take the following Modern Forms:
ReplyDelete1) "Evangelical Dominionism": influencing politics, education, media, law etc from a high position.
2) "Catholic Integralism": A solely *spiritual* authority which influences civil authorities... and must be (Roman?) Catholic.
3) "A Smaller Church": purified, humble, shining more clearly now, drawing people through its radiance.
With multi-culturalism and pluralism, the boat rather seems to have sailed for no. 1 (though one meets folk saying they'd prefer almost any variety of Christian theocracy might be preferable to the current situation!) No. 2 would surely not be agreed to by the Eastern Orthodox and others. No. 3 seems a possibility, but a variant of it, no. 4, might be added, which would not be so visible, which perhaps might prove necessary, and the witness of churches which came through the Eastern Bloc experience, for example, remaining strong cores, might be put forward.
I think that the Church is still stuck in the mode of Christian authority, a position that it hasn't really held for decades as the tides of Christendom have retreated. It has sought to preach morality to others, while being alternately legalistic, unapproachable and scandal-ridden. The time for that model has passed.
ReplyDeleteOne of the images of the Church has always been as the Ark of salvation. But, before Noah could invite anyone aboard, he had to build it. And Ark full of holes is useless, and it strikes me that we need to patch up our own craft before we try to float it.
We are called to be salt in the world, but Christ also said that there is a time to shake the dust from your shoes and flee to the hills. The early desert fathers and mothers left the city (and dealt lightly with the institutional Church of their time) because of the hopeless level of corruption, immorality and decadence. And yet, many of them found little solitude because people came to them in droves to hear them teach and ask for wisdom, because holiness attracts. To build a holy city, you need holy people.
I think we may be entering a darkening age, and this - from the essay - may be the way ahead:
DeleteOther Christians hear "city on a hill" and conclude that visibility need not mean power. Rather, it means building luminous communities whose quiet holiness cannot be ignored. It means building beautiful, authentic Christian communities that serve as beacons of hope in a darkening world.
It aligns with my very first post on here.
Well tough. After cases of male sex abuse by clergy a female Archbishop was inevitable. The head of the English established church also leads the church of a nation where same sex marriage is legal. Most of her English parishioners will not be dictated to by the Church of Uganda where homosexuals arrested. If the Church of Uganda walks so be it, the Anglican communion is no more than a symbolic union if churches Catholic but Reformed using the BCP. The Archbishop of Canterbury is not an Anglican Pope
DeleteAfter cases of male sex abuse by clergy a female Archbishop was inevitable.
DeleteA non sequitur.
The head of the English established church also leads the church of a nation where same sex marriage is legal.
Whatever one's own views on the matter, you're conflating legality with morality. If slavery were legal, should the Abp own slaves?
Most of her English parishioners will not be dictated to by the Church of Uganda where homosexuals arrested.
I don't believe anybody is making such a claim.
If the Church of Uganda walks so be it, the Anglican communion is no more than a symbolic union if churches Catholic but Reformed using the BCP.
This is a very Anglocentric claim. God is not an Englishman. If the English church errs, should not other churches offer fraternal correction?
The Archbishop of Canterbury is not an Anglican Pope
Again, nobody has made such a claim.
So the new Archbishop of Canterbury is a woman. Who could have seen that coming?
ReplyDeleteI wonder how the traditionalists will take this.
Right! I'm still waiting for a reply from my (traditional-ish) CofE friend; I'm guessing that it'll be indifference, as it won't impinge much upon his actual spiritual life. Mullally talks quite well to please both wings of her church, but that may merely mean mealy-mouthedness.
DeleteYes, she speaks out of both sides of her mouth, as they say. As in this gem on abortion: 'I would suspect that I would describe my approach to this issue as pro-choice rather than pro-life although if it were a continuum I would be somewhere along it moving towards pro life when it relates to my choice and then enabling choice when it related to others – if that makes any sense.'
DeleteYep, I do remember reading that 🥴. Many non-UK Anglican communities won't want to be led by her.
DeleteNo, it certainly won't further the unity of the Anglican Communion. The Archbishop of the Ugandan church wrote:
DeletePraise God from whom all blessings flow!
I am writing to share the sad news that the Rt. Rev. Sarah Mullaly, the Bishop of London, has been appointed as the next Archbishop of Canterbury.
Our sadness about this appointment is her support and advocacy for
unbiblical positions on sexuality and same-sex marriage that reveal her departure from the historic Anglican positions that uphold the authority of Scripture for faith and life.
As a founding member of @gafconference, Church of Uganda considers this appointment to further deepen the tear in the fabric of the Anglican Communion that began in 2003 with the TEC consecration as Bishop of a divorced father of two living in a same-sex relationship.
The tear in the fabric of the Anglican Communion has now reached the highest level of the Communion. There appears to be no repentance. Make no mistake, this is a grievous decision at the highest levels of the Church of England to separate itself from the vast majority of the global Anglican Communion.
We offer our prayers for those in the Church of England who are disillusioned by this appointment and extend our hand of fellowship to them through Gafcon and the Global South Fellowship of Anglicans.
As we declared in our 2023 Gafcon statement from Kigali, we no longer recognize the Archbishop of Canterbury as having global authority and the office is certainly no longer an “Instrument of Communion.”
With this appointment, the Archbishop of Canterbury is reduced simply to the Primate of All England.
Likewise, we want to assure our Christians in the Church of Uganda that, through Gafcon and the Global South Fellowship of Anglicans, we are part of a worldwide communion of Anglicans who continue to proclaim the historic and Biblical faith of Anglicanism – faithfulness to Christ and submission to the authority of Scripture.
The future of Gospel-centred mission in our Anglican tradition is bright. “The fields are ripe for harvest; we pray for laborers to go into the harvest.” As we declared at our 2018 Gafcon meeting in Jerusalem, “We will proclaim Christ faithfully to the nations.”
Yours, in Christ,
The Most Rev. Dr. Stephen Samuel Kaziimba Mugalu
ARCHBISHOP OF CHURCH OF UGANDA
In no uncertain terms! It's almost like they wanted to cause division and disharmony in their church... it can't have been so difficult to find a more traditional male for the job.
DeleteSo his opposition is to LLF which was passed by a majority of Synod not to a woman being Archbishop anyway. Homosexuality is effectively illegal in Uganda but same sex marriage legal in England so its established church is in a completely different situation. In any case the head of the Anglican communion is set to be rotated amongst Anglican Archbishops globally rather than just be the Archbishop of Canterbury
DeleteYes, this rift goes way back. I think it started with some of the African provinces protesting what they saw as the failure to properly discipline the American Episcopal Church for blessing or conducting same sex marriages, I can't remember which. It's deepened at the CofE (and other branches of the AC) have attempted to walk this bizarre line of simultaneously holding the secular view that SSM is a blessing and the traditional view that it's a sin.
DeleteI think, while that last few ABCs have, to a degree, worn a mask of traditionalism while advancing liberal sentiments, the mask is now off. Traditionalist evangelicals and Anglo-Catholics will not view her ordination as valid, albeit for different reasons, and a symptom of her modernism and liberalism. Personally, I can't but see the appointment of a woman as a political act (how convenient that God always seems to call people who align with the zeitgeist!) and the writing on the wall for those who don't accept women's ministry. That aside, it's her endorsement of same sex relationships is what's depended the already existing rift with the Ugandan church.
Even if the headship is rotated, the see of Canterbury is still of enormous symbolic importance (even if some might say there hasn't been an ABC since 1558!) In light of 1 Cor 8:10ff. & Romans 14:13-23, I think this is a bad appointment.
Ugandan Anglicans have the option of joining their own home-grown African Orthodox Church, founded by Ruben Mukasa, who was ordained by Patriarch Christophoros II, the Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Alexandria.
DeleteHi, thanks for the letter from the Archbishop of Uganda. Do you have the link, please?
DeleteI saw it on X, but it's also here:
Deletehttps://anglican.ink/2025/10/04/uganda-statement-on-the-appointment-of-the-archbishop-of-canterbury/
Hi Lain, thanks so much! I have shared the link with some fellow Anglicans and also taken the liberty of including your comment on Sarah Mullally.
DeleteShe sounds like a relativist. Absolutely ambivalent about abortion!
You're welcome! Yes, you're absolutely right about that. As someone has described her, 'Welby, but a girl'.
DeleteFor info, this is the letter from the Archbishop of Sydney's deputy:
Deletehttps://sydneyanglicans.net/mediareleases/public-statement-on-the-archbishop-of-canterbury-appointment
Appointment of the Archbishop of Canterbury
We acknowledge the appointment of Dame Sarah Mullally as the 106th Archbishop of Canterbury with a spirit of prayerful reflection and gospel-centred concern.
We commend Dame Sarah's distinguished record of public service in healthcare and recognise her achievements in administrative leadership.
However, we also recognise that this appointment comes at a time of profound theological tension within the Anglican Communion. The recent trajectory of the English Church--particularly regarding issues of human sexuality, biblical authority, and unity--has caused deep concern among those who hold to the historic and reformed teachings of Scripture.
Her public comments show she has strayed from the clear teaching of scripture and promoted serious error that will neither advance unity nor the mission of the church.
The office of the Archbishop of Canterbury once held a symbolic leadership role in the global Anglican Communion. However, due to a tragic failure to uphold biblical teaching, successive Archbishops have forfeited the trust of orthodox Anglicans, who now look to other leaders.
The Church of England and its new leadership must urgently return to the message of faith, hope, and love entrusted to us by our Lord Jesus Christ.
Bishop Peter Hayward
Commissary for the Archbishop of Sydney (on leave)
4 October 2025
Biodata of Archbishop Kanishka Raffel:
https://sydneyanglicans.net/seniorclergy/archbishop_raffel
This is the view from Anglican Unscripted (about 12 min):
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E83Bk4xMSLw&t=1306s
Oh dear, those two don't have anything much good to say about the new Primate of All England. Plus there appears to be a safeguarding issue in this one's skeleton cupboard as well... that chat will help them to avoid discussing theology a bit longer.
DeleteGadjo
Late to these posts.
ReplyDeleteSomeone who has had a signficant influence on contemporary Christianity is Charles Taylor: his writings, writings which were chewed over and found their way into the writings of evangelical apologist Tim Keller, in ways at looking at the meanings of 'secular', the importance of knowing your interlocutor's position, case, better than they do. As an approach it has sometimes been described as winsome.
One of Keller's key themes is ways in which idolatry may manifest in our lives today, inside and outside the church.
As for Wisdom there is, first and foremost , a need to study the Wisdom literature in Scripture. One excellent fist port of call may be Keller's, 'The Way of Wisdom'.
Yours in Christ, Geoff
THIS IRISH PRIEST JUST SAID WHAT MANY ARE THINKING – AND IT’S CAUSING CHAOS - YouTube
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdb40zvOv_Y
That's actually a thoughtful piece. Thanks for posting.
DeleteGood article, Jack. Apart from all the Catholic stuff, obvs.
ReplyDeleteThe key is in the scripture you quote at the end - to be like Christ. He spent time in the desert, time alone, time with his family, with sinners and with the multitudes. In him we see where we should be and how to act in each situation.
...time in the desert, time alone, time with his family, with sinners and with the multitudes.
DeleteAren't these all spending time with sinners?