The Deception of Modern 'Christian' Leaders


Almost 2,000 years ago, St Paul wrote to Timothy about the terrible times to come: “People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, inhuman, implacable, slanderers, profligates, brutes, haters of good, treacherous, reckless, swollen with conceit, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God” (2 Tim. 3:2-4). 

Paul’s vice-filled description appears to describe the 21st century Western world and many of its 'religious' leaders. The moral practices of Western Christians are essentially the same as those of non-Christians. As Protestant scholar Michael Horton laments: “Christians are as likely to embrace lifestyles every bit as hedonistic, materialistic, self-centered, and sexually immoral as the world in general.”    Paul continues his description of the Last Days by characterising the people as “holding the form of religion but denying the power of it.” The sinful people he’s talking about are 'Christians', describing them as having a “corrupt mind” and practicing a “counterfeit faith” (2 Tim. 3:8). They are deceived and are deceiving others.St Peter also speaks of the end times in a similar manner in the third chapter of his second letter. He notes that the Last Days will be filled with “scoffers” and “lawless men” who “follow their own evil desires” rather than God’s righteous decrees. Sadly, these men masquerade as true believers and use Scripture to support their sin. Peter closes his letter by pointing out that some passages in the Bible, in particular, Paul’s letters, are “hard to understand” and subject to being misinterpreted. He encourages his readers not to get carried away by false teachers, “ignorant and unstable” people who take Scripture and “twist” it, “as they do other scriptures.” These evildoers will not be prepared, Peter warns, for the “day of the Lord,” which will come “like a thief in the night” and bring judgment on the earth. They twist Scripture “to their own destruction” (2 Pet. 3:1-18).According to Paul, the way to avoid the fate of these men is to understand and use Scripture properly. Earlier in his letter, he had already admonished Timothy to be a workman who does not need to be ashamed before God, but who correctly handles the word of truth (2 Tim. 2:15). Then, after describing the Last Days, Paul lays out a battle plan for Timothy by commanding him to “preach the word,” because “all scripture is inspired by God and profitable for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work” (3:16). As Timothy uses Scripture to “convince, rebuke, and exhort,” he will be attempting to counteract the evil done by false teachers, because “the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander into myths” (4:3-4).The problem today is that we have ostensibly 'religious people' - in all the Churches - using Scripture for nefarious ends. They are abandoning true doctrines and replacing them with allegedly scriptural teachings they are more comfortable with. Teachings that allow them to exhibit the sinful characteristics listed by Paul and Peter. 

What's the solution? Just how do we "understand and use Scripture properly"? 

Comments

  1. "Go, sit in your cell; and your cell will teach you everything."

    ReplyDelete
  2. St Paul is so impressive and remarkable..Thank you for these scriptural quotes....they are spot on in describing our world....unarguable. I say sit in your cell and listen to Bach....if you're classically trained it's all in your head you don't need anything else thus the importance of a compulsory classical education system which has not existed for a very long time. Catholicism had the right idea about encouraging reflection and self analysis through retreats We used to have retreats from a very young age.. Now there is a fear of being alone with one's thoughts .I miss my religion but at least I understand what and how it is meant to be and that is going to get me through.....I wish younger Catholics had had the benefit of my religious education.
    Cressida

    ReplyDelete
  3. Speaking of unfaithful modern church leaders:

    Archbishop of Uganda: "We now want to ask the Church of England, “Do you have the integrity to step out of the Anglican Communion because you have departed from the Anglican faith?” God called you to preach a Gospel of repentance and faith. Instead, you’re like Jonah. You have disobeyed and are running in the opposite direction."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many thanks for that quote. I have found the full article (dated 10 Feb 2023):

      https://www.ugstandard.com/archbishop-kaziimba-the-church-of-england-departed-from-the-anglican-faith-and-are-now-false-teachers/

      “KAMPALA —The Anglican Church in Uganda has announced that it is set to split from the Church of England after the latter on Thursday said it would approve same-sex marriages.”

      And here’s the context of the quote:

      “We now want to ask the Church of England, “Do you have the integrity to step out of the Anglican Communion because you have departed from the Anglican faith?” God called you to preach a Gospel of repentance and faith. Instead, you’re like Jonah. You have disobeyed and are running in the opposite direction.

      God called the church to go to Nineveh and preach repentance, but the Church of England is running to Tarshish and preaching acceptance of sin. There is no way we are walking together.

      The Church of England, together with the Episcopal Church in America, the Anglican Church of Canada, the Church in Wales, the Scottish Episcopal Church, the Episcopal Anglican Church of Brazil, and others – these are the Provinces that have walked away, but we pray for them to repent.

      And, if they refuse to repent, then we call on them to have the integrity to form their own Canterbury Communion because what they believe is not Anglicanism and it is not the faith once delivered to the saints.

      If they want to take their whole church into the belly of a whale, they are free to do that; we are, after all, autonomous Anglican Provinces. We think it’s a bad idea, but they are free to do it.”

      He was speaking to journalists. Please do read the whole article!

      Delete
    2. I'd say "Rome awaits", but considering the influence of James Martin, I'm not so sure.

      Delete
    3. @Right Angle

      Thanks. If you click on the words 'Archbishop of Uganda', which is highlighted in red for me, it will also link you to the full press release.

      @Bell

      I think most of the Anglo-Catholics who'd be concerned about this have already left. Many of the ones I know who are still in the CofE are same sex partnered themselves. I'm watching the evangelical wing with interest; I wonder if this will be their oft-announced uncrossable red line, or if they'll simply find a way to push the line back again.

      The only way the CofE (or certain Catholic dioceses for that matter) will change trajectory is if bishops stop being able to draw a stipend; ideological adherence can rarely withstand the prospect of being turned out of the Palace and having to work like one of the plebs.

      Delete
    4. Thanks, er ... I didn't realise that was a link!

      Delete
    5. I may have mentioned this here before, a few weeks ago. If so, I apologise for repeating myself. From one day to the next we’re waiting to see who Pope Francis is going to pick to replace the 78-year-old Cardinal Ladaria Ferrer as the prefect of the Dicastery (formerly the Congregation) for the Doctrine of the Faith. George Weigel, a conservative American Catholic who is usually extremely well informed, warned us back in December that it was going to be a progressive German bishop named Heiner Wilmer. If that turns out to be true, we’re in trouble.
      https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2022/12/16/bishop-heiner-wilmer-this-catholic-moment-and-the-catholic-future/

      Delete
    6. We're already in trouble.

      Delete
    7. Some here might already know, or be interested to know, that another option exists for desparing African Anglicans: the African Orthodox Church started in Uganda a century ago and was not the result of missionary work but of the founders' own studies, and it is now under the Patriarchate of Alexandria. More than that I do not know.

      Delete
  4. So it's goodbye to Nicola Sturgeon and goodbye to Jeremy Corbyn, both on the same day. It's easy see why Starmer felt the need to start clearing the decks ahead of the upcoming general election, but what happened to convince Sturgeon her time was up? Was it sending a rapist to serve his sentence in a women's prison? It was obviously a very silly -- almost comically silly -- thing to do, but I wouldn't have expected it to be a resigning matter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. From a Guido Fawkes poster:

      Mr Blue Sky
      25m
      Rumours abound that she is about to be interviewed by the police over the missing £600k, and her hubby's loan.

      Looks like the Procurator Fiscal has run out of excuses for the delays.

      There are also the Stewart McDonald emails, which Craig Murray is threatening to release any time soon (pending legal advice).

      Delete
    2. Ah, money matters. Disappearing public funds and all that. Yes, that makes much more sense. Thank you, Right Angle.

      Delete
    3. You are most welcome! And here's a tweet from Adrian Hilton:

      https://twitter.com/Adrian_Hilton/status/1625822722822471680?cxt=HHwWgIC82eDJipAtAAAA

      Delete
    4. And read more here (I do love copy and paste):

      https://order-order.com/2023/02/15/sturgeon-twice-dodges-questions-about-police-investigation/

      Delete
    5. @Right Angle, your username is a new one, I think? Am I right in interpreting it as "Conservative Anglican"? Or alternatively, perhaps, as "Conservative in East Anglia"?

      Delete
    6. Hi Ray, I was Tropical Anglican on the Cranmer site!

      Delete
  5. Sturgeon was trapped. She has nowhere to go with independence, she's a laughing stock over the Gender Recognition Bill, Plod is knocking on the door and the menopause waits for no man. Stamping your foot and making outrageous demands can only carry a political career so far.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The independence grift is a gift for nationalists. All she had to do was make lavish promises which she'd never have to deliver on, stamp her feet and blame everything on Westminster. She could safely let health, transport, education and the rest fall apart knowing the hardcore Scottish nationalists and the devolved electoral system meant that anyone championing independence was guaranteed to win. It was shoehorning in all the other ideology that undid her.

      Delete
    2. Hello again, @Chef. I don't do Twitter, but thanks to Right Angle's link (above) I enjoyed your four-part answer to the question of "What is better for the Scots now than a decade ago?" Particularly your second point. Very shrewdly observed.

      Delete
    3. @Chef (great to see you back here) & 雲水:
      And yet, I think that nationalism, stamping your foot and 'independence' may be a perpetually winning strategy during challenging times: Braveheart was woefully historically inaccurate (and kinda racist if you're English) but even many of the intelligent Scots prefer the fantasy.

      Delete
    4. @Gadjo

      Precisely. The black and white simple answers of one-issue grievance politics are always appealing; people much prefer prepackaged answers over nuanced ones that they have to think about. It's easy to gain popularity promising things that you'll never have to deliver, much like the fantasies that come from whoever is occupying the benches of HM's Official Opposition.

      The SNP and independence are much like a dog chasing a car: if they ever caught it, they wouldn't know what to do with it. Sturgeon's Covid dictatorship, overreaching speech laws and gender recognition act should give Scots a taste of the kind of authoritarian nightmare an independent Scotland would be under the SNP, so I'd probably question the 'intelligent' part of your statement!

      Delete
    5. 雲水,
      I don't think we've faced as uncertain a future as we do now for many generations, and some people are going to grab at nationalism more than ever, and I guess it's understandable. The Scot I was mainly thinking about is certainly intelligent and is also a member of the famously conservative 'Wee Frees' church there, but it seems he is also now captured by nationism and liberalism.

      Delete
  6. Good news ... but will there be whinging that the replacement FM has been appointed by the SNP and not as the result of an election?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Will it make a difference who replaces her? Will it just be another tentacle of the same blob?

      Delete
    2. Your question contains the answer .... probably.

      Delete
  7. Gosh, the blog has suddenly turned very English. I've long suspected that Nicola Sturgeon was secretly an officer of MI5. She couldn't have done more damage to the cause of Scottish nationalism if she actually WERE. Be that as it may, however, all she has really done is delay the inevitable, rather than stop it. Once the thought of independence became a live, realistic option in Scotland, it was only ever going to be a matter of time before it happens. Prior to the Alex Salmond's rise to the office of FM, it was just a fringe, almost crank piece of romanticism, but now it's an accepted alternative for just about every Scot. They may be reluctant to do it, but the point is, it's no longer unthinkable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Bell, from time to time we are told that the Shetland Islanders don't want to be part of an independent Scotland and that, if that were to happen, they would secede. Is there any truth in that, or is it just English wishful thinking/ schadenfreude?

      Delete
    2. @Bell,
      As the English are no longer allowed to be publicly nationalistic, blogs are pretty much all they have left now (and they did invent the computer and the Internet after all).

      Delete
    3. Having been to the outer hebrides and chatting to locals I doubt they want independence.

      Delete
    4. @Ray Sunshine -- It's actually my wife who's the Scot, not me, although I've spent a lot of time there. The Shetlands have muttered about succeeding from Scotland, it's true, but how seriously to take that is anyone's guess. If they were to remain part of an rUK, they'd be even more remote and isolated than they are now, both geographically and politically. Whatever crumbs they get from the table of Edinburgh, they wouldn't even get in the dining hall of London, and they know it, so if Scottish independence came about, which way would YOU go if you were a Shetlander?

      @Gadjo -- I entirely agree (about the public nationalism, anyway), and it's entirely an elite coterie of leftist journalists, activists and politicians who are being offended by the English being English on behalf -- or so they imagine -- of the rest of the world. I'm Irish myself, and I do not and never have had a problem with the flag of St George, and I don't know of any Irishman who has. The Union Jack is another matter, but the English flag is just the flag of another country and is flown freely in Dublin at this time of year alongside the flags of the five other nations. It's not an issue, so why do the likes of Emily Thornberry have a problem with it? If anything, I think it's actually a good thing that English nationalism is asserting itself. It's time for a realignment within "the islands" (as perhaps we should just call them) and I believe everyone is ready to deal in a spirit of goodwill, but to do that we all need to acknowledge who we are, and the English are and have always been English first, last and always, not British. It's just that the didn't distinguish between the two. I think they're doing that now, and that opens up interesting possibilities.

      Delete
    5. @Bell,
      The comments you make are interesting. I'm of mixed heritage myself, but I have lived for so long outside The Isles now that I can barely guage the sentiments there any longer.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Has Israel lost the war against Hamas?

The Wind that's Coming

Shades of Things to Come?