SNP Leadership - "Duplicitous, Corrupt, and Potentially Criminal"
Senior members of the SNP are braced for Nicola Sturgeon’s “imminent” arrest now she is the only party official named on their most recent financial accounts who hasn’t been interviewed by the police. Ms Sturgeon’s name appeared on the 2021-22 accounts, alongside her husband Peter Murrell and Colin Beattie, both of whom have been arrested and questioned.
Ms Sturgeon is not attending the Scottish parliament this week, with her spokeswoman claiming she did not want to overshadow policy announcements by Humza Yousaf, her successor.
Ash Regan, former candidate for the SNP leadership, has also called for Nicola Sturgeon, Peter Murrell and Colin Beattie to be suspended from the SNP. “I think if it’s found that people have been involved in something of this nature, that certainly until that can be cleared up, whether that’s one way or the other, they should be suspended from the party. I think this can be resolved with decisive action, and I think that action should be taken to restore confidence both of members of the SNP and the public as well.”
Operation Branchform, the police investigation into what happened to the £600,000 of donations for the next independence referendum which were supposed to be ring-fenced, has blown up the SNP and the former First Minister’s reputation. The pictures of the police tent on the front lawn of Nicola Sturgeon and Peter Murrell’s home cannot be unseen. Nor can the extraordinary sight of £110,000-worth of top-of-the-range campervan being towed away from the home of Murrell’s elderly mother.
The list of unanswered questions grows ever longer. What did happen to the £600,000? Why did Murrell lend the SNP £107,000 from his personal resources? Is it really credible that his wife knew nothing of this transaction?
Why was Nicola Sturgeon reportedly telling party activists there was no problem with SNP finances? Why did the resignation of Douglas Chapman MP as party treasurer not set alarm bells ringing at the time and merit a thorough investigation? Why now have Johnston and Carmichael quit as the SNP’s auditors, and who will replace them?
Perhaps most important of all, is it really credible that the timing of the former First Minister’s resignation was unconnected to the police inquiry into the SNP finances, as she claims? It is hard to see how she could possibly have survived in office after a police officer was reportedly spotted prodding the ground in her back garden with a spade. Did she know what was coming, and made a swift exit, despite saying just weeks before that that she still had “plenty left in the tank”?
At the time of the leadership contest, wearing the mantle of the ‘continuity candidate’ looked like a major advantage for Yousaf. He was heavily backed by the party establishment from John Swinney downwards, by a host of MPs and MSPs, and even by Sturgeon’s former chief of staff. Those endorsements don’t look like such assets now.
For years, the SNP have made the case for Scottish separation partly on the grounds of supposed Scottish moral superiority. “Look at that lot down in Westminster”, they would say, “with their lies, sleaze and corruption. We are better than them – it’s time to break away.” It was a message that, at one time, had a certain resonance.
Not any more. We now have not one, but two, former SNP First Ministers whose periods in office are clouded with accusations of scandal which have led to police investigations. To paraphrase the old joke, there are as many former SNP First Minsters with reputations in the gutter as there are giant pandas in Scotland. So much for moral superiority.
Where does this leave the hapless Yousaf? The start of his leadership is equivalent to being promoted to the captaincy of the Titanic after it hit the iceberg. Even the SNP president Michael Russell has damned him with faint praise, with the words “The King is dead, long live the King. That’s the way it’s got to be.” Not exactly the ringing endorsement the new leader might expect from the epitome of the man in a grey kilt.
There is no sign of a honeymoon bounce for Yousaf, with his already negative personal ratings likely to slip still further. Polls suggest that the SNP is shedding support to both the Scottish Conservatives and Labour.
It is remarkable to think that only two months ago there was a serious discussion as to whether the SNP might achieve more than 50 per cent of the popular vote in the next general election by treating it as a de-facto referendum on independence. Latest polling puts them well adrift of that target, and slipping fast. No wonder Russell has said “I don’t think independence can be secured right now”. Even amongst the strongest enthusiasts for separation, there is a real sense that it is all over.
Can Yousaf even survive the next few weeks? Will the tide of events sweep him away, as SNP members realise the horrible error they made in electing the continuity candidate of a regime now exposed as duplicitous, corrupt, and potentially criminal? And will they now turn to Kate Forbes, secure in her Highland fastness, as the saviour who can rescue them and their party from the almighty mess that they find themselves in?
We have friends in Scotland who know Kate Forbes personally. She is assuredly not their saviour, though they might prefer her in the job.
ReplyDeleteThank you for posting this, Jack. For those of us living a long way from the Old Country, it’s a refreshing change to get an insider’s view of what the North Britons are up to.
ReplyDeleteSee the treasurer has resigned
ReplyDeleteMurrell's resignation must now be imminent. He'll be gone within 48hrs.
DeleteThe saddest thing about all of this is that none of these politicians actually care about the people of Scotland. It's just Game of Thrones-esque power plays. As with Boris' indiscretions, nobody's actually interested in the morality of it all; the Scottish Conservatives and Labour see it as an opportunity to damage the SNP for their own gain, and the SNP are worried that it'll loosen their iron grip on power. All they've done in political terms is break the 11th commandment: don't get caught.
ReplyDeleteI don't believe that the outcome of the police investigation will be any criminal charges being laid. I suspect they'll decide that it'll be for the SNP to decide what disciplinary proceedings they will take.
DeleteNot so sure there wont be charges of fraud and breaching election financing regulations. See this Wiki article.
DeleteOne thing I don't get, when were they intending to tell the party they were without auditors and also as they needed to have signed off accounts to qualify for Westminster funding, when were they intending to sort it out?
DeleteI wouldn't be so sure, Jack. If I, as a freelancer, am a penny out on my tax return, it's a Very Serious Matter. If a former chancellor forgets a few million, it's a whoopsie.
Delete@Jack, I followed your link to the Wikipedia article. Look at this sentence. It doesn't seem to mean anything.
ReplyDeleteThe police have also been asked to look at a loan of £107,620 made in June 2021 by Peter Murrell, the SNP's chief executive at the time and husband to Nicola Sturgeon, the SNP's party leader and First Minister of Scotland at the time, after a party meeting discussed the funding being looked at by the police.[4]
I've done my best to disentangle the syntax and the only meaning I've found is this: Peter Murrell lent £107,620.It doesn't say who the money belonged to. Maybe it was his own money. And it doesn't say who he lent it to. It describes Murrell as "husband to Nicola Sturgeon" but it doesn't say she was the one he lent the money to. What do you make of it, Jack?
@Ray - that sentence cites this article. The money was lent by Murrell to the SNP itself.
DeleteTHE SNP have responded to Scottish Tory accusations of "murky" finances after Peter Murrell – the party’s chief executive – loaned it more than £100,000 ...
Rules state the body [Electoral Commission] should have been notified 30 days after the end of the quarter in which the loan was made. However, it was instead told in August 2022.
The Scottish Tories claimed the loan was “beyond odd” and that Murrell’s role in the SNP was growing "murkier" ...
Craig Hoy, the Scottish Tory MSP and party chairman, had said it was “high time the SNP came clean to their own members about what is actually going on and explained why their chief executive is making such large loans to the party his wife leads”.
Thank you, @Lain. The article in The National links in turn to a blog I'd never heard of until now, but I've bookmarked it for future reference:
Deletehttps://wingsoverscotland.com/borrowing-from-peter-to-pay-paul/
Wings over Scotland is a notorious blog, interestingly the author chooses not to live in Scotland, but Bath!
DeleteUnfairly or not, I've never really followed his blog, he's seen as a precursor to the cyber Nat's.
@Clive, does this explain the blogger's notoriety?
Deletehttps://ahdinnaeken.wordpress.com/2015/08/23/exclusive-fake-reverend-exposed-as-self-serving-sham/
Nott really he has allegedly trolled and harassed people on line, he has been arrested and was banned from Twitter, he hasn't as far as I'm aware ever been charged and found guilty of these things.
Delete