Crannóggy Island

"May the LORD rejoice in his works." (Psalm 104:31) The God Who Needs Nothing Genesis does not open by explaining God. It opens with Him speaking, and the first thing said of what He makes is that it is good. Again and again the verdict comes: God saw that it was good. And at the end, complete: "God saw everything that he had made, and indeed, it was very good." Before there is a doctrine of God, there is a Maker Who looks at what He has made and delights in it. The doctrine came later, worked out carefully because so much depended on getting it right. God is one, eternal, uncreated, all-powerful, all-knowing, all-loving, good beyond any goodness we can imagine. He is, in the old phrase, actus purus : no potential left unrealised, nothing in Him still waiting to become something else. Aquinas gave the classical formulation: in God, essence and existence are not two things. God is ipsum esse subsistens , subsistent Being itself. Everything else receives its being. Go...

Preface This is the second of two essays that do not attempt to explain evil away or reduce providence to a formula that removes mystery. They are an invitation to consider how a good God can create a world with a genuine wound in it, and govern that world without either overriding its freedom or abandoning it to itself. The Question of Providence Having asked why a good God permits a world with a wound in it, a second question follows close behind, and it is no easier: how does He govern such a world at all, without becoming either the wound's author or a stranger to it? Ask someone what it means to say God governs the world, and you will usually get one of two pictures. In the first, God is a hand pulling every movement from above. Nothing happens that He does not directly bring into being: the storm, the accident, the choice you made this morning. Free will becomes a kind of illusion, convincing from where we stand, invisible from His side of the curtain. In the second...

Preface This is the first of two essays that are not an attempt to explain evil away, or to reduce providence to a formula that removes mystery. They are an invitation to consider how a good God can create a world with a genuine wound in it, and govern that world without either overriding its freedom or abandoning it to itself. The Wrong Question Ask many people why a good God permits evil, and they will answer as though the question had only one possible form. God could have made a perfect world. This world is not perfect, so something has gone wrong. That assumption needs to be examined before we accept it. It suggests an answer to a prior question none of us voiced: what sort of creation would a good God make in the first place? A finished world that later broke? Or a world still on its way to the glory for which it was made? We should admit, before going further, that not every "why" receives an answer. Job asked this question in its oldest form and was answered wit...